COURT TECHNOLOGY AND TRIAL PRESENTATION

The Court Technology and Trial Presentation Blawg features articles, reviews and news of interest to lawyers and other legal professionals. This blog is published by Ted Brooks, a Trial Presentation and Legal Technology Consultant, Author and Speaker. Ted's trial experience includes the Los Angeles Dodgers divorce trial, People v. Robert Blake murder trial, and a hundreds of high profile, high value and complex civil matters.

All materials © Ted Brooks, unless otherwise indicated.

SOCIAL Twitter -- LinkedIn -- Facebook WEB www.litigationtech.com PHONE 888-907-4434

Thursday, July 5, 2018

TrialDirector 360

TrialDirector 360

Although it hasn't yet been officially released yet, here are a few initial thoughts on the new TrialDirector 360, some of which are from my LinkedIn post. If you'd like to follow along, feel free to connect and follow my profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ted-brooks-778190/ 


You will need to set up an Ipro 360 account, which will manage your Ipro software and will eventually serve as another method of creating and working with your cases. Parts of this, along with some features in TD360 are still being finalized. This initial review is on a Beta website, and the locally installed version is 1.0.0.0.



Once you're all registered, you can then download the software. This is the set for TrialDirector 360.


TrialDirector 360 is looking pretty good so far. Regardless of which software you're planning on using in the next few years, you're going to have to learn a few new tricks if you want to stay in business. While the Presentation mode is familiar, you'll want to spend some time learning to navigate the new database. There are still a number of features and things yet to be finalized, although what I've seen so far (in version 1.0.0.0) looks solid. #trialdirector #ipro #TD360 #TrialDirector360


One major change/improvement is the way TD360 handles PDF files. In previous versions you could set document breaks only with TIFFs, and not PDFs. TD360 converts the PDFs to .png format, allowing you to add/remove/reorder/rename individual pages. The converted file size may be larger than the original, which is also imported to the file set. One example is a PDF of 109KB and the .png converted at 1.89MB. You will want to make sure to change your case data default location (see image) to somewhere with enough capacity, especially if you're running a small SSD for your applications. 

Default file path and convert MPEG-2 option (click to enlarge)

The Document Resequence dialog allows you to change Doc ID, Exhibit numbers, etc., addressing the need for an easier way to set up Bates numbering. For those familiar with scanning apps, this will totally make sense.

Video Clip Editing - remove lines and redact text (click to enlarge)

You can't import a batch of synced video files, at least not yet. They need to be imported one-at-a-time.

Here are a couple questions and answers that have already come up.

Q:  Any easier way to batch fill Bates #s?  It would be great if TD would  automatically populate bates numbers similar to the way it handles exhibit numbers.  Then the user could just clean up and correct any bates #s that are not sequential. 

A:  Depending on which field you want to use for your Bates numbers, you can now select groups of exhibits and rename Doc ID, or you can still work with the Exhibit fields as your Bates.

Q:  On clip export, did they change the export options?  Mainly, more detailed MPEG settings and better audio? 

A:  Actually, there are 3 video export flavors of MP4 on the clip export. Standard iPad is smallest file size (352x240), then MPEG 4 (352x240) and Hi-res iPad (1920x1080). Audio exports to MP3.


Saturday, February 17, 2018

Litigation Statistics: Settle or Fight?


Although the overall percentage of cases filed actually going to trial remains predictably low (around 2-3%, depending on where you’re getting your data, the period covered, and type of case), this year has started off (for us, anyway) with a trend we’ve seen before during times of economic growth. I’m not going to get all analytical here, but it is noteworthy to those involved in litigation and related services.

At just over halfway through February, we’ve had twenty cases on our 2018 trial calendar, and nine have settled. Some of these have not yet started trial, but that is a 45% settlement rate, or 55% of our cases have gone or appear to be going to trial.

Compared to recent years where we have seen a lower volume but higher “run” rate (around 80% in 2017), this seems to indicate that the use of technology-driven litigation support services (e.g., trial presentation) have become the desired or default method of presenting evidence. In other words, more trial teams are bringing in qualified assistance earlier in the litigation, and not waiting until the last minute, when all efforts at settlement or resolution have been completely exhausted. I see this as a win for everyone – the trial team gets some assistance and direction early on, the client gets the benefit of additional preparation, and of course, the service provider benefits as well. Trials are not won by intentionally limiting preparation.

Although this is certainly not a scientific study, I see our little sampling as very encouraging and beneficial for everyone involved in litigation – from the Plaintiff to the Expert Witness, attorneys and jurors. Even the Court benefits when technology is properly utilized in trial, shortening the length of a matter significantly.

I’ve heard many excuses over the years attempting to justify not using technology (see Why You Should NOT Use Technology in Your Trial), and we’ve all seen how technology can reshape an entire industry (e.g., Uber, Lyft and Taxi Cabs).

Whether you hope to settle or try your case, it is always advisable to plan for the best, and prepare for the worst.


Monday, January 1, 2018

2018 - Something Old, Something New

Y2K with Brobeck (scary times) 
Beginning with my time in-house at Brobeck (1998-2002), I have enjoyed writing about Legal Technology for many publications. Many reprints were available on earlier versions of the Litigation-Tech website. After some updates and upgrades over the years, these had become "orphaned," meaning they were still available online, but could only be found by running a specific web search. As a Holiday project, I decided to set them up in an archive, so they would be available once again. Although these articles are somewhat "dated," many of them are still surprisingly relevant. The archive is intended to preserve these older articles, which were written prior to the Court Technology and Trial Presentation blog, which I started writing in 2009. Things are different for writers now, in that you can click, and publish. Back in the day, you'd write, submit to the publication editor, get change-requests, edit and submit updated version(s), and then  wait for several weeks to finally see it arrive in print. I still have a big bunch of published print-media articles  in my bookcase. It's hard to say which is more enjoyable from the author's perspective, although quick edits or changes are easy online - not so much when you were limited to reading it on paper. With that introduction, here are links to the archive, with a few notes on what you can find at each one. I truly hope you appreciate it.

---Ted Brooks

But first, here is the most-popular article of 2017:

Ten PowerPoint Tips for the Courtroom


The Archive

Articles Archive Contents - This is sort of a directory, although not all-inclusive. Many links are here with brief descriptions.


Articles Archive 4 -

Articles Archive 5 -
Articles Archive 6 -